Search for: All records

Abstract The 2021 shallow plate‐boundary thrust‐faulting and 2023 outer rise normal‐faultingM_W7.7 earthquakes southeast of the Loyalty Islands produced significant, well‐recorded tsunamis around the North and South Fiji Basins. The two earthquakes occurred in close proximity on opposing sides of the Southern Vanuatu Trench with similar seismic moments and east‐west rupture lengths but different faulting mechanisms. This provides a basis to examine tsunami sensitivity to source geometry and location for paths in the complex southwest Pacific region. Finite‐fault models of the source processes for both events were inverted from teleseismic body wave data with constraints from forward, nonhydrostatic modeling of regional tide gauge and seafloor pressure sensor recordings. The wave motions are reversed in sign, with a leading crest generated by 1.31 m uplift on the upper plate slope for the 2021 tsunami and a leading trough from 2.37 m subsidence on the subducting plate near the trench for the 2023 tsunami. The more recent outer rise normal faulting produces narrower seafloor deformation beneath deeper water resulting in shorter period tsunami waves that shoal and refract more effectively along seamounts and island chains to produce a more elaborate radiation pattern. The source location relative to seamounts and small islands in the near field influences the energy lobes and directionality of the far‐field tsunami to the north. In contrast, both events have very similar radiation patterns to the south due to absence of major bathymetric features immediately southward of the sources. 

Abstract The 1938M_S8.3 and 2021M_W8.2 earthquakes both ruptured within the Semidi segment of the Aleutian‐Alaska subduction zone. The large‐slip distribution of the 2021 event is well constrained within the depth range 25–45 km, with seaward tsunami observations excluding significant shallower coseismic slip. The 1938 event slip distribution is more uncertain. Regional and far‐field tide gauge observations for the 1938 event are modeled to constrain the location of large coseismic slip. The largest slip (2.0 m) is located below the continental shelf on a 180‐km‐long portion of the rupture extending further northeast than the 2021 rupture, to near Sitkinak Island. Minor slip (1.0 m) extends seaward under the continental slope to 8 km deep, where large slip may have occurred in 1788. The megathrust shallower than 25 km depth to the southwest experienced many small aftershocks and aseismic slip following the 2021 event, and has limited slip deficit. 

Abstract The subduction zone along Oaxaca, Mexico, has experienced multiple Mw ≥ 7 earthquakes that ruptured in close proximity several decades apart in at least three locations along the coast. Similarity of waveform recordings from a few long-period seismic stations at teleseismic distances has provided evidence for up to three repeated failures of the same slip patches, or persistent asperities, in the region. The evidence from prior single-station comparisons is bolstered by considering azimuthally distributed sets of body-wave recording pairs for the 1968 and 2018 Pinotepa Nacional (western Oaxaca), and 1965 and 2020 La Crucecita (eastern Oaxaca) earthquakes, as viewed in the long-period World-Wide Standardized Seismograph Network instrument passband (>5 s period). Drawing on detailed slip inversions for the most recent events and observations of their relationships with regional slow-slip events, we note features to be alert for in central Oaxaca where prior repeating events in 1928 and 1978 occurred and there is potential for a similar future event. 

Abstract Most great earthquakes on subduction zone plate boundaries have large coseismic slip concentrated along the contact between the subducting slab and the upper plate crust. On 4 March 2021, a magnitude 7.4 foreshock struck 1 hr 47 min before a magnitude 8.1 earthquake along the northern Kermadec island arc. The mainshock is the largest well‐documented underthrusting event along the ∼2,500‐km long Tonga‐Kermadec subduction zone. Using teleseismic, geodetic, and tsunami data, we find that all substantial coseismic slip in the mainshock is located along the mantle/slab interface at depths from 20 to 55 km, with the large foreshock nucleating near the down‐dip edge. Smaller foreshocks and most aftershocks are located up‐dip of the mainshock, where substantial prior moderate thrust earthquake activity had occurred. The upper plate crust is ∼17 km thick in northern Kermadec with only moderate‐size events along the crust/slab interface. A 1976 sequence withM_Wvalues of 7.9, 7.8, 7.3, 7.0, and 7.0 that spanned the 2021 rupture zone also involved deep megathrust rupture along the mantle/slab contact, but distinct waveforms exclude repeating ruptures. Variable waveforms for eight deep M6.9+ thrusting earthquakes since 1990 suggest discrete slip patches distributed throughout the region. The ∼300‐km long plate boundary in northern Kermadec is the only documented subduction zone region where the largest modeled interplate earthquakes have ruptured along the mantle/slab interface, suggesting that local frictional properties of the putatively hydrated mantle wedge may involve a dense distribution of Antigorite‐rich patches with high slip rate velocity weakening behavior in this locale. 

Abstract On 18 November 2022, a large earthquake struck offshore southern Sumatra, generating a tsunami with 25 cm peak amplitude recorded at tide gauge station SBLT. OurW‐phase solution indicates a shallow dip of 6.2°, compatible with long‐period surface wave radiation patterns. Inversion of teleseismic body waves indicates a shallow slip distribution extending from about 10 km deep to near the trench with maximum slip of ∼4.1 m and seismic moment of  Nm (M_W7.3). Joint modeling of seismic and tsunami data indicates a shallow rigidity of ∼23 GPa. We find a low moment‐scaled radiated energy of , similar to that of the 2010M_W7.8 Mentawai event () and other tsunami earthquakes. These characteristics indicate that the 2022 event should be designated as a smaller moment magnitude tsunami earthquake compared to the other 12 well‐documented global occurrences since 1896. The 2022 event ruptured up‐dip of the 2007M_W8.4 Bengkulu earthquake, demonstrating shallow seismogenic capability of a megathrust that had experienced both a deeper seismic event and adjacent shallow aseismic afterslip. We consider seismogenic behavior of shallow megathrusts and concern for future tsunami earthquakes in subduction zones globally, noting a correlation between tsunami earthquake occurrence and subducting seafloor covered with siliceous pelagic sediments. We suggest that the combination of pelagic clay and siliceous sediments and rough seafloor topography near the trench play important roles in controlling the genesis of tsunami earthquakes along Sumatra and other regions, rather than the subduction tectonic framework of accretionary or erosive margin. 

Tsunamis generated by seafloor displacements accompanying large submarine earthquakes provide sensitivity to absolute slip position and distribution for offshore faulting analogous to that of geodetic observations for landward faulting. Tsunami recordings at deep‐water and near‐shore ocean bottom pressure sensors and tide gauges, along with runup and inundation measurements, can now be reliably modeled using detailed bathymetric structures and robust numerical codes. As a result, tsunami observations now play an important role in quantifying coseismic slip distributions for large submarine earthquakes in subduction zones and other tectonic environments. Applications of joint modeling or inversion of seismic, geodetic and tsunami observations for recent major earthquakes are described, highlighting the specific contributions of the tsunami observations to source model resolution. Tsunami observations provide unique information on the up‐dip extent of earthquake coseismic slip on subduction zone megathrust faults and occurrence of near‐trench slip, which are usually not well constrained by seismic and land‐based geodetic signals. Tsunami signals also help to detect offshore slow slip that is not evident in seismic or land‐based geodetic data and to balance geophysical constraints on ruptures that extend from on‐shore to off‐shore. Tsunami runup measurements and stratigraphic deposits further provide unique constraints on large earthquake ruptures that occurred prior to modern geophysical instrumentation.